mcp-v1.10
getzep/graphitimcp-v1.10Sep 1, 2026by mehulp93
AI Summary
Fixes database routing inconsistencies in the MCP server, ensuring all operations consistently use the configured Neo4j database.
Key Highlights
- Fixes Neo4j database routing and honors NEO4J_DATABASE configuration
- Behavior change for self-hosted Neo4j Enterprise deployments using non-default databases
- Ensures data consistency across add_memory and search operations
Breaking Changes
- Self-hosted Neo4j Enterprise deployments using custom database names must explicitly set NEO4J_DATABASE in .env or config.yaml. Operations previously hitting the home database may need data migration.
Full Release Notes
⚠️ Behavior change for existing Neo4j deployments: WHO IS AFFECTED: Self-hosted Neo4j Enterprise deployments where NEO4J_DATABASE (or database: in config.yaml) was set to something other than neo4j. Standard setups using the default neo4j database need no action. Before: The MCP server ignored your database setting; add_memory / search could hit the server’s home database while other operations used the configured one — data could be split across two databases. After: All operations consistently use the configured database. Set NEO4J_DATABASE explicitly in .env or config.yaml: NEO4J_DATABASE=your_database_name Migration: If you previously ran with a custom database name configured but data appeared missing, check your Neo4j home database — earlier writes may have landed there and may need to be migrated. ## What's Changed * fix(ci): bump gh-action-pypi-publish for metadata 2.5 by @prasmussen15 in https://github.com/getzep/graphiti/pull/1821 * Bump graphiti-core to 0.30.1 by @prasmussen15 in https://github.com/getzep/graphiti/pull/1822 * Fix Neo4j database routing and honor NEO4J_DATABASE in MCP server by @mehulp93 in https://github.com/getzep/graphiti/pull/1812 **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/getzep/graphiti/compare/v0.30.0...mcp-v1.10